Typographical Happenstance

Reply to my portfolio - Type

nobody@flickr.com (em_____) — Sat, 07 Jul 2007 08:20:54 -0700

em_____ posted a reply:

very nice ...a good job

my portfolio - Type

nobody@flickr.com (shch_andrey) — Wed, 31 Jan 2007 20:08:27 -0800

shch_andrey posted a new topic:

would like to get some positive criticism of my portfolio from you

www.sgr.kiev.ua

shch graphics group

Reply to Cool Typography Video Link

nobody@flickr.com (~ptx) — Tue, 10 Oct 2006 09:33:02 -0700

~ptx posted a reply:

oh :o) thanks for sharing.

Cool Typography Video Link

nobody@flickr.com (Mamluke) — Tue, 10 Oct 2006 09:13:31 -0700

Mamluke posted a new topic:

thought this group might enjoy this typography video from the backspace group in Australia:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=PsrcVV7nsb8

New Group: Ampersandland

nobody@flickr.com (splorp) — Mon, 05 Jun 2006 10:49:55 -0700

splorp posted a new topic:

Hi.

I have started up a new group dedicated to our favourite conjunctive characters.

Ampersands, ands, ets, &s.

www.flickr.com/groups/ampersandland/

Images must contain a typographic ampersand. An ampersand does not have to be the most prominent part of the image, it just needs to appear somewhere within the frame. That's really the only rule.

Hope to see you there.

invitation to join Japanese Magazines & MOOKs (Magazine-bOOK)

nobody@flickr.com (superlocal) — Mon, 03 Apr 2006 05:43:42 -0700

superlocal posted a new topic:

hi hi,

just started a new group cos i love mags & MOOKs from Japan.
if you do, too, it would be great to see your stuff!

Japanese Magazines & MOOKs (Magazine-bOOK) ^^

cheers,

superlocal

Reply to how accidental?

nobody@flickr.com (nthdegx) — Sat, 16 Jul 2005 05:28:09 -0700

nthdegx posted a reply:

Not accidental at all :) It's just a name, really.

how accidental?

nobody@flickr.com (only alice) — Wed, 13 Jul 2005 02:52:56 -0700

only alice posted a new topic:

Hello, I just found this group and it looks fabulous. But I don't want to spam up your lovely pool by submitting inappropriately planned-looking letters, so I thought I'd gauge opinion: how accidental does this typography need to be? I have a few borderline kind of cases in my photos, like this:

It's definitely a deliberate design, but I think it's supposed to look like two domoe (teardrop-ish) things rather than the letter S. (You can see it in context here.)

again, definitely designed, but probably not meant to look like kisses. any opinions?

Art Discussion Forum

nobody@flickr.com (uberguy) — Fri, 06 May 2005 02:56:46 -0700

uberguy posted a new topic:

There is a great new art discussion forum called The Art Forum, take a peek, there are some interesting discussions going on.

www.theartforum.net/

Worth A look.

Reply to Let's spell things!

nobody@flickr.com (wiwik01) — Wed, 30 Mar 2005 19:21:20 -0800

wiwik01 posted a reply:

Hello all. I'm a newbie here.

I happened to be assigned to look for the whole alphabet around us and to make a poster for it for a class last quarter. Since I'm currently living in Miami Beach, I thought that Art Deco would be a nice theme.

Let me know what you think. (The "Z" is pretty far-fetched, isn't it?)