Concours photo Archibook, publication sur l'architecture Mudam

Reply to Please clarify requirements on camera resolution

nobody@flickr.com (Mudam Luxembourg) — Tue, 22 Sep 2009 05:57:59 -0700

In short:
- for landscape 5315x3248 pixels
- for portrait 2539x3248 pixels
Is this satisfactory as an answer?

Reply to Please clarify requirements on camera resolution

nobody@flickr.com (Thomas Roessler) — Tue, 22 Sep 2009 03:40:12 -0700

If, by 300dpi, you indeed mean 300 points per inch on the photo (as opposed to a rendering for 300dpi printing), then many of the photos will be disqualified -- and no, not just those from "compact" cameras.

In short, please clarify in the conditions what the minimum resolution for submissions is, in pixel.

Reply to Please clarify requirements on camera resolution

nobody@flickr.com (Mudam Luxembourg) — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 03:25:34 -0700

Mudam Luxembourg posted a reply:

Dear Thomas Roessler,

As the winning photograph will be published in a book, 300 dpi is unfortunately a technical requirement that has to be guarantied to get a good printing quality. So I'm afraid that the photograph has to have been taken with a bridge camera and that most of the compact digital cameras won't do the work needed here...

Hope you'll still be able to participate.

Respectfully,
Germain Kerschen
g.kerschen@mudam.lu

Please clarify requirements on camera resolution

nobody@flickr.com (Thomas Roessler) — Sat, 08 Aug 2009 04:53:52 -0700

Thomas Roessler posted a new topic:

Hello,

looking through the rules of the contest... If the dpi and size requirements are meant to apply to pixels per inch for the raw photo, then that means 17 megapixels (5314 x 3248) for landscape, and 8 megapixels (2480 x 3248) for portrait submissions. 8 mp is probably achievable with current amateur equipment (though I'd love to submit one photo taken with a 6mp camera a few years ago...); decent 17 mp sensors are basically out of reach for "amateur" level cameras.

(Looking through some of the submissions so far, many have been taken with 8-10 megapixel equipment.)

Please clarify what the requirements of the contest are with respect to the resolution of the pictures that can be submitted.

Thanks!

Reply to 3 photos max!

nobody@flickr.com (dr_kim_veis [''o ]) — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 10:57:13 -0700

dr_kim_veis [''o ] posted a reply:

ok, merci!

Reply to 3 photos max!

nobody@flickr.com (Mudam Luxembourg) — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 07:50:47 -0700

Mudam Luxembourg posted a reply:

Ausser Flickr ging dat net zouloossen?
Vum Mudam aus ass do kee Problem. Bis den 30te September.

Reply to 3 photos max!

nobody@flickr.com (dr_kim_veis [''o ]) — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 06:21:59 -0700

dr_kim_veis [''o ] posted a reply:

kann ech nach wiesselen? Ech hun der lo 2 am pool mee ech hun der nach vill dei net verschafft sin. kann ech dei dei dran sin laeschen an ersetzen duerch aanerer bis den 30ten?

Reply to 3 photos max!

nobody@flickr.com (Mudam Luxembourg) — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 00:00:27 -0700

Mudam Luxembourg posted a reply:

Ass och scho geschitt. bis elo huet juste een nach net reagéiert an en huet jo nach zäiz bis den 30te september fir e puer fotoen eroof ze huelen.

Reply to 3 photos max!

nobody@flickr.com (dr_kim_veis [''o ]) — Mon, 03 Aug 2009 18:17:08 -0700

dr_kim_veis [''o ] posted a reply:

ech mengen daat geet nemmen fier dei fotoen dei nei derbai kommen. Deenen leit dei schon mei fotoen am pool haaten muss de wahrscheinlech bescheed soen dass se der e puer laeschen...

Reply to 3 photos max!

nobody@flickr.com (Mudam Luxembourg) — Sun, 02 Aug 2009 11:53:27 -0700

Mudam Luxembourg posted a reply:

Its done!

Thanks a lot for telling. That was really helpful.

Schéine Bonjour zeréck.