<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	    xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	    xmlns:creativeCommons="http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/rss/creativeCommonsRssModule.html"
	          xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
      xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
      xmlns:woe="http://where.yahooapis.com/v1/schema.rng"
	    xmlns:flickr="urn:flickr:user" >
	<channel>


		<title>Uploads from vgm8383, tagged by, with geodata</title>
		<link>http://www.flickr.com/photos/vgm8383/tags/by/</link>
 		<description></description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 11:07:39 -0700</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 11:07:39 -0700</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>http://www.flickr.com/</generator>
		

		<item>
			<title>Golden Gate Bridge in HDR</title>
			<link>http://www.flickr.com/photos/vgm8383/2371803132/</link>
			<description>			&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/people/vgm8383/&quot;&gt;vgm8383&lt;/a&gt; posted a photo:&lt;/p&gt;
	
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photos/vgm8383/2371803132/&quot; title=&quot;Golden Gate Bridge in HDR&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2367/2371803132_bcfabca9ab_m.jpg&quot; width=&quot;240&quot; height=&quot;184&quot; alt=&quot;Golden Gate Bridge in HDR&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://bighugelabs.com/flickr/onblack.php?id=2371803132&amp;amp;size=large&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;View On Black&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I received a lot of interest (310,000+ views) over this photo &lt;a href=&quot;http://flickr.com/photos/vgm8383/2176897085/&quot;&gt;flickr.com/photos/vgm8383/2176897085/&lt;/a&gt;.  Unfortunately there was a tremendous amount of noise and artifacts from the HDR processing.  I have tried a different method to reduce the noise and this is what I ended up with -- which, while far, far from good, is an improvement over the first picture which sparked so much discussion.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For those wondering, this photo was generated with 3 exposures (bracketed +/-2), ISO 100, 44mm and processed in Photomatix.   The original, non-HDR version is here:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://flickr.com/photos/vgm8383/2371865686/&quot;&gt;flickr.com/photos/vgm8383/2371865686/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks to SFTravel.com for putting this photo on their front page:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sftravel.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.sftravel.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Explore: 3/29/08, thank you!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 11:07:39 -0700</pubDate>
			                        <dc:date.Taken>2008-01-06T13:01:54-08:00</dc:date.Taken>
            			<author flickr:profile="http://www.flickr.com/people/vgm8383/">nobody@flickr.com (vgm8383)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:flickr.com,2004:/photo/2371803132</guid>
                <georss:point>37.819548 -122.481079</georss:point>
    <geo:lat>37.819548</geo:lat>
    <geo:long>-122.481079</geo:long>
    <woe:woeid>2489278</woe:woeid>
                <media:content url="http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2367/2371803132_bcfabca9ab_b.jpg" 
                   type="image/jpeg"
                   height="786"
                   width="1024"/>
    <media:title>Golden Gate Bridge in HDR</media:title>
    <media:description type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://bighugelabs.com/flickr/onblack.php?id=2371803132&amp;amp;size=large&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;View On Black&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I received a lot of interest (310,000+ views) over this photo &lt;a href=&quot;http://flickr.com/photos/vgm8383/2176897085/&quot;&gt;flickr.com/photos/vgm8383/2176897085/&lt;/a&gt;.  Unfortunately there was a tremendous amount of noise and artifacts from the HDR processing.  I have tried a different method to reduce the noise and this is what I ended up with -- which, while far, far from good, is an improvement over the first picture which sparked so much discussion.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For those wondering, this photo was generated with 3 exposures (bracketed +/-2), ISO 100, 44mm and processed in Photomatix.   The original, non-HDR version is here:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://flickr.com/photos/vgm8383/2371865686/&quot;&gt;flickr.com/photos/vgm8383/2371865686/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks to SFTravel.com for putting this photo on their front page:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sftravel.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.sftravel.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Explore: 3/29/08, thank you!&lt;/p&gt;</media:description>
    <media:thumbnail url="http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2367/2371803132_bcfabca9ab_s.jpg" height="75" width="75" />
    <media:credit role="photographer">vgm8383</media:credit>
    <media:category scheme="urn:flickr:tags">sf california bridge sky cloud storm by clouds canon gold golden bay interestingness gate suspension explore goldengatebridge goldengate suspensionbridge tone hdr stormclouds rainclouds winterstorm mapped themoulinrouge photomatix bridgesan abigfave rebelxti franciscocity abduzeedo goldengatebridgehdr sftravelcom</media:category>
		<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/deed.en</creativeCommons:license>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>